The Library

Landmark stroke trials.

A growing reference of the trials that shaped how stroke is treated — one paragraph each, organized by the question they answered. Deeper articles link out where they exist.

Recruiting now: live stroke trial finder →

Educational summaries only

These are short reference summaries — consult the primary sources for clinical decisions.

§ 01 · Thrombolysis

Acute IV reperfusion.

NINDS 1995

Question

Does IV alteplase given within 3 hours of ischemic stroke onset improve outcomes?

Bottom line

Yes — absolute increase in favorable outcomes despite a higher symptomatic ICH rate. Established IV thrombolysis as standard of care.

ECASS III 2008

Question

Does IV alteplase work in the 3 to 4.5 hour window?

Bottom line

Yes — modestly improved outcomes. Extended the treatment window to 4.5 hours.

§ 02 · Thrombectomy

Endovascular therapy.

MR CLEAN 2015

Question

Does mechanical thrombectomy plus standard care beat standard care alone in anterior-circulation LVO?

Bottom line

Yes — dramatically. First positive modern thrombectomy trial. Opened the era of EVT.

ESCAPE 2015

Question

EVT with rapid workflow and CT-angiography-based selection out to 12 hours.

Bottom line

Substantial benefit. Reinforced the role of imaging-guided selection and fast workflow.

SWIFT PRIME 2015

Question

Solitaire stent retriever in anterior LVO within 6 hours.

Bottom line

Significant functional benefit. Confirmed stent-retriever EVT in the early window.

EXTEND-IA 2015

Question

EVT with CT-perfusion-based selection (small core, large penumbra) within 6 hours.

Bottom line

Strongly positive. Established the value of perfusion imaging to identify salvageable tissue.

HERMES 2016

Question

Pooled individual-patient meta-analysis of the five 2015 EVT trials.

Bottom line

NNT roughly 2.6 for 1-point mRS improvement. Cemented EVT as one of the most effective treatments in medicine.

§ 03 · Late window

Extending the clock.

DAWN 2018

Question

EVT in the 6 to 24 hour window using clinical-core mismatch.

Bottom line

Profoundly positive. NNT roughly 2 for functional independence. Opened the late window.

DEFUSE 3 2018

Question

EVT in the 6 to 16 hour window using perfusion-imaging mismatch.

Bottom line

Strongly positive. Confirmed the perfusion-imaging selection approach in the late window.

§ 04 · Large core

Beyond the small core.

RESCUE-Japan LIMIT 2022

Question

EVT for large-core ischemic stroke (ASPECTS 3-5).

Bottom line

Better outcomes with EVT despite a higher ICH rate. First positive large-core trial.

SELECT2 2023

Question

EVT for large-core anterior LVO (ASPECTS 3-5 or core ≥ 50 mL).

Bottom line

Significant benefit with EVT. Helped extend EVT eligibility into larger cores.

ANGEL-ASPECT 2023

Question

EVT in large-core anterior LVO (ASPECTS 3-5) within 24 hours.

Bottom line

Positive. Reinforced EVT benefit in selected large-core strokes.

TENSION 2023

Question

EVT vs medical management in large-core anterior LVO (ASPECTS 3-5).

Bottom line

Stopped early for benefit. Consistent with SELECT2 and ANGEL-ASPECT.

§ 05 · Anticoagulation

When to start AC after AFib stroke.

ELAN 2023

Question

Early vs late initiation of DOAC after ischemic stroke with atrial fibrillation.

Bottom line

Early DOAC was non-inferior — numerically favored — for the composite of recurrent stroke and bleeding. Supports earlier anticoagulation in selected patients.

OPTIMAS 2024

Question

Early (≤ 4 days) vs delayed DOAC after ischemic stroke with AFib.

Bottom line

Early was non-inferior. Together with ELAN, supports shifting toward earlier DOAC initiation in most patients.

§ 06 · At the bedside

The instruments these trials standardized.

Every trial above reports outcomes in the same currency — an mRS at 90 days, an ASPECTS on the baseline CT, an NIHSS at the door. Those scales left the trials and became the bedside vocabulary.

The library will keep growing. Suggest a trial that should be added — or one that's been miscategorized — via the contact page.

The Vascular Brief

One monthly email. The trials that mattered, the protocols that changed, the questions still open.